An
informative analysis of what the seemingly disadvantaged population designate
as “racism” and the evidence to counteract this illogical proposition. For
hundreds of years, humans across the global hemisphere have experienced
discrimination by other humans in lieu of their appetence for world domination
and succession of their own respective agendas. That in order for egoism to
have relevance and acceptance in society, it must fail to be cognizant of
public/contemporary occurrences that impacts the species. Notice that the term
‘species’ was used and not ‘race’, for the topic of discussion is the
disillusionment of the fabricated misnomer of ‘race’ as well as ‘racism’.
Transcript
{Interrogator}
“The time is now 10:48 am.
“Alright, sir!”
(cut to scene)
“state your name please.”
{Jay}
“I don’t have a name.”
{Interrogator}
“What do you mean ‘you don’t
have a name’?
“I don’t have a name. a name
is a label of a company or corporation.”
{Interrogator}
“Okay, so what do you
identify yourself as?”
{Jay}
“I identify myself as a
human being.”
{Interrogator}
“Sir…what do people call
you?”
{Jay}
“People call me numerous
things… retarded, stupid, ugly, disgusting, annoying, the bane of their
existence, dead weight, repulsive, unattractive, steve urk…”
(Interrogator)
“Okay! Stop it! That’s
enough! now i’m not letting you leave until you answer my questions! is that
understood?”
(Jay)
“……”
(Interrogator)
“Now what’s your
race/cultural background?”
(Jay)
“Don’t have one.”
(Interrogator)
“What do you mean ‘you don’t
have one?”
(Jay)
“I’m not attached nor
associated with any invalid nomenclature that’s counterproductive to the biological
system of classification meant to properly identify multi – cellular organisms…
--as well as promulgate the
sociological anomaly of race, which is a division of a species that arose as a
consequence of geographical isolation and distancing within a species.
- A division of a species
that was meant to ‘divide and conquer’ a species i.e. humans.
- Now for those who fell
asleep in biology and science class, pay attention.
There are 7 (in some cases,
8) taxonomic ranks in the biological system of classification.
*domain
*kingdom
*phylum
*class
*order
*family
*genus
*species
and anything below species
is considered a sub – species i.e. race.
Making us ‘less than a
human’ or ‘subhuman’ or ‘to the full capacity of animals, extraterrestrials, or
primitive beings that lack a central nucleus capable of deductive reasoning and
analytic processing.
according to the u.s.
census, it was around the year of 1890 where the first recorded entry of the
term “race” was added along with the nomenclatures:
white,
black,
quadroon,
octroon,
chinese,
japanese,
mulatto
and the grammatically
incorrect
“indian”
thereby incorporating the
subhuman standard into our psychological regimen.
Which is where ideological
concepts such as “3/5ths of a ‘white’ person”, “separate but equal”, “racial
profiling”, “race mixing”,” Helter Skelter”, “integration” et al, come into
prominence, completely disseminating the injurious rhetoric of ignorance and
prejudice towards the body politic.
before the revolutionary war,
elitism was the premier focus that managed to marginalize an entire
demographic.
Intelligence, finance, commerce,
status, education, etc. were the properties of the elite.
So, up until the early 19th
century, “slave” was the common designation used to describe able – bodied men
and women regardless of skin color coerced in performing free, manual labor.
Oh, and were also devoid of
intelligence, finance, education, status, genetics, bloodline (other than what
they were designated with) as collateral for their capitalistic agendas.
So, a man or a woman with
pale, light skin, limited finances, education and connections to the elite,
were slaves or indentured servants.
As well as a man or woman
with brownish or darkened skin with the same inconveniences as previously
described.
(Since all of these ‘elitist
luxuries’ were prohibited to them).
It wasn’t until after the
war that the focus was not necessarily on economics but on skin color to perpetuate
the substandardization of a species.
(Interrogator)
“Sir, are you aware that
“substandardization” isn’t even a word?”
(Jay)
“Then let me be the first to
coin it.”
Substandardization:(n) the
psychological action, operation or administration of coercive tact designed to make
humans deficient, inferior and/or insignificant in quality, status or function.
now back to it!
The idea of color was so
pervasive that it eventually ceased from becoming an adjective designated to
describe the pigmentation of one’s skin, but a condensed attribute of one’s
status as a human being.
A sense of identity.
A sense of competitive
angst.
That one ‘race’ is superior
to that of another with every advantage one would amass be that of a collective
summit that would reinforce the preponderance of that specific ‘race’.
and in the aftermath of the
mutual belligerency, the victorious ‘race’ would claim dominion over the land and
adjust the maxims, precedents and canons to better accommodate their own respective
interests.
But here’s a question.
Actually three.
1) what does
it mean ‘to be black’?
2) what does
it mean ‘to be white’?
3) what does
it mean “to be chinese, japanese, korean, german, australian, portuguese,
spanish, mexican, latino, hispanic, etc.?
No seriously.
Because according to
physics, color is visible light with a specific wavelength that reflects off
objects and into the cornea, allowing us to see color.
Red, orange, yellow, blue,
green, indigo, violet, brown, pink, gray are examples of visible light with specific
wavelengths.
Black and white aren’t
colors because they don’t possess specific wavelengths. instead, ‘white’ is the
presence of all wavelengths of visible light while ‘black’ is the absence of
visible light therefore, the absence of all wavelengths.
So, for you to identify as
“black” would be to identify as “the absence of light” meaning “no wavelengths”,
meaning “no color” meaning “life”. however, your existence is entirely
dependent on the absence of multiple spectrums of light i.e. color.
And if color is present, you
would cease to exist.
And for you to identify as
“white” would be to identify as “the presence of light” meaning “all
wavelengths”, meaning “all colors, meaning “life”. but your existence is
entirely dependent on the presence of multiple spectrums of light i.e. color
And if color is not present,
you would also, cease to exist.
SO, it’s physically
impossible for humans to identify as “black” or “white” because we – are –
matter. We are physical objects that light reflects off of.
There is no black and white,
only dark and light.
Also, “chinese, japanese,
korean, german, australian, portuguese, spanish, mexican, latino, hispanic” are
commonly refered to as “ethnicities”
These are also examples of
adjectives meant to describe a person’s country of origin but, like ‘race’, has
been often used interchangeably to refer to a person’s identity or status
within a population.
when, once again, it’s
physically impossible for a person to identify as geographic landmasses without
transmogrifying your physical appearance into that of a split deviation of the
original geographic landmass that you identify as.
You cannot transform into a
country!
And if you can, please also
transform into a 78 – piece combo with watermelon, biscuits, apple juice and hot
sauce on the side.
Oh, and all the fries you
can give me! thank ya, thank ya, ah, thank ya!
In conclusion, what most
people refer to ‘racism’ is merely ignorance, prejudice and discrimination. (in
that order).
Because when one doesn’t
possess knowledge about the other, ignorance is most likely to develop amongst
people, causing people to ignore another group of people and become cynical
towards them due to their inability to have knowledge of them in order to
enforce power over them.
since knowledge is power,
after all.
And due to this lack of
knowledge, humans opinionate and prejudge in an attempt to belittle and
derogate others as compensation for the power that they so characteristically
lack.
and off of this prejudice,
unfavorable, unfair and unjust treatment ensues over the affected group known
as discrimination.
And discrimination is
applicable to anyone regardless of skin color, sex, sexual orientation, gender,
status, background, age, affiliation, etc.
Also, we don’t need attached
designations to describe stimuli that impacts all people in this world.
“black issues”, “white life”
“black america”, “white america”, “white nationalism”, “black nationalism”,
“black history month”, “american history”, u.s Dollar, black dollar, black
lives matter, white lives matter, blue lives matter, latino lives matter, all
lives matter, my life matters! your life matters! my brother’s life matters, my
sister’s life matters! my mother’s life matters, my father’s life matters!
everybody’s life matters, not just yours!”
Because to place a
designation on varying subjects would be to imply a distinction between your
subjects and conventional subjects.
i.e. “what is it about your
issues that’s different from anyone else’s?”
(Interrogator)
“well, blacks are the most
disrespected people in this country”
“Blacks are killed more times
by police than any other race”
“And our people have been
enslaved for over 400+ years!”
(Jay)
“And you’ve just proven my
point! your focus is entirely centered around the injustices of one distinctive
populace while limiting your perspectives of all others’ injustices!
when they are all inherently
the same thing!
And it becomes a
competition, a race, a comparison between differing groups of people on who
suffers the most!
Instead of a sudden
realization of the fact that we’re all victims of injustices committed by the
‘elitist’ power structure and most importantly, ourselves.
(Interrogator)
“And you’re saying all of
this to say….?”
(Jay)
‘Race’ and ‘racism’ is false
Does not exist
Has not ever existed
And is hereby debunked!
